Philosophies of nature

In current usage, nature has long been presented dichotomy as what is around the man, not him, and that is driven by processes and forces that are beyond him. Nature was the environment in which man lived. But science and ecology in particular have shown that the nature (co-) evolves over time and space, according to complex principles, including those of the (evolution) and the forces that animated or diverted by the humans have become capable of changing the major planetary processes.
Particularly among animist peoples, nature is sometimes presented as showing the equivalent of an autonomous will or sense. So is it common to hear that the nature of revenge is what he done wrong, or to make it a hundredfold well he did, and that certain acts are against nature. These expressions suggest that modern humans attaches particular value to nature, ethics and morals, he will include or not.

Nature is perceived by the senses and is thinking of ways variable species and individuals included [ref. desired]. From a philosophical point of view, the distinction is merely between nature, the nature of species and the representation of human nature (homo sapiens). The reasoning confine, limit and therefore clarifies default human capacity and scale to give, to recognize and consider the value of the exercise.
The representation of "human nature" is logically existing human philosophies and cultures as possible.
The philosophy of nature "is a subject of seemingly undiscovered by being alive, despite multiple Miroitements felt.